Ramesh Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87031 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-189 Year-2025 Thana- CHARPOKHARI District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Ramesh Singh Son of Bijesh Singh R/o Vill. - Madarraha, P.S. - Charpokhari, Dist.- Bhojpur(Ara).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rahul Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Uday Chand Prasad, APP For the Informant :

Ms. Malti Kumari, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 15-01-2026 Heard Mr. Rahul Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Uday Chand Prasad, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State as well as Ms. Malti Kumari, learned counsel for the Informant.

2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since 27.09.2025 in connection with Charpokhari P.S. Case No. 189 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 07.09.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 125(2), 126(2), 109, 352 and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023.

3. According to prosecution case, the informant alleged that on 02.09.2025, the petitioner attacked his father by means of wooden leg with intention to kill him due to which his father received injury.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87031 of 2025(2) dt.15-01-2026 2/3

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. Although there is specific allegation against the petitioner that he has assaulted informant's father and the injury inflicted upon him is grievous in nature but the same is not on vital part of the body. He further submits that the police after investigation submitted the charge sheet and the petitioner is in custody since 27.09.2025.

5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the Informant have vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that there is direct and specific allegation of assault against the petitioner and apart from that the petitioner carries two criminal antecedents other than the present one but fairly submits on the basis of paragraph-3 of the bail application that the petitioner is on bail in the said matters.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M., Bhojpur (Ara) in connection with Charpokhari P.S. Case No. 189 of 2025, subject to the following conditions:-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87031 of 2025(2) dt.15-01-2026 3/3 i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below. ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

iii. And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Suruchi/- U T