Rajaram Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88374 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-191 Year-2025 Thana- SAHEBPUR KAMAL DistrictBegusarai ====================================================== Rajaram Yadav Son of Late Govind Yadav Resident of VillageKumharchakki, P.S.- Muffasil, Dist.- Khagaria ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Pawan Kumar Chaurasia, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 09-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a case instituted under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 352, 351(1), 351(2), 303(2), 109(1), 3(5) of B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. As per prosecution case, the F.I.R. named accused persons including petitioner armed with deadly weapons surrounded the informant and started abusing her. Petitioner is alleged to have assaulted the informant with iron rod due to which she sustained head injury. It is further alleged that petitioner took away gold ear-rings from the informant.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88374 of 2025(2) dt.09-01-2026 2/3 petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The F.I.R. has been lodged after two days without any plausible explanation. The present case is a counter blast of Khagaria (Muffasil) P.S. Case No.44 of 2025 dated 20.03.2025 lodged by the petitioner against the father and other family members of informant. There is no specific allegation of repeated blow against the petitioner. The allegation of taking away gold ear-rings of informant is ornamental. The petitioner has one criminal antecedent which is of complaint case in which cognizance has not been taken till date. It appears that from perusal of the injury report of the injured, the injury caused by hard and blunt substance is not grievous in nature. Petitioner undertakes to cooperate in the investigation and the trial.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks from today, the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned concerned court in connection with Sahebpur Kamal P.S. Case No.191 of 2025
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88374 of 2025(2) dt.09-01-2026 3/3 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) harish/- U T