← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./34617/2018bail granted

Aniket Chaudhary @ Ankit Kumar Choudhary v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2018-06-29Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.34617 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1906 Year- 2014 Thana -DARBHANGA COMPLAINT CASE District- DARBHANGA ======================================================

1. Aniket Chaudhary @ Ankit Kumar Choudhary, Son of Jitendra Chaudhary, Resident of Village- Karyapatti, Police Station- Kamtaul, District- Darbhanga.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Deepak Thakur, S/o Arun Kumar Thakur, R/o Village- Shishkak Colony, Azamnagar, P.S.- L.N.M.U., District- Darbhanga. .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Girish Chandra Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ahmad Ali, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 29-06-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and leaned Additional Public Prosecutor of the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Complaint Case bearing C.R. Case No. 1906 of 2014 (Darbhanga), registered for offences punishable under Sections 302 and 120 (B) of the Indian Penal Code.

The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner along with others has caused the death of the deceased, who happens to be the brother of the complainant. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that this complaint petition has been lodged after one and a half year of the occurrence and no specific allegation of assault has been attributed against the petitioner. It is further been submitted

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.34617 of 2018 (3) dt.29-06-2018 2/2 that earlier the sister of the petitioner filed a criminal case against the mother of the complainant, who has already been arrested. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposes the prayer of bail.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as discussed above, let the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of six weeks from the date of the order, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Complaint Case bearing C.R. No. 1906 of 2014 to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate- IX, Darbhanga , subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438 ( 2) Cr.P.C. with other that bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the Court concerned and petitioner shall cooperate in the investigation and shall be present before the police as and when required, otherwise prosecution is at liberty to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sudha/- U T