Navin Kumar Mandal @ Navin Mandal v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.30420 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-285 Year-2014 Thana- RUPAULI District- Purnia ====================================================== Navin Kumar Mandal @ Navin Mandal, son of Ambika Prasad Mandal, Resident of Village- Badia, P.S. Barhara Kothi (Raghubansh Nagar). DistrictPurnea ... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. Ram Prawesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party :
Mr. Sri Ajit Kumar (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 16-05-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel representing the State.
The petitioner wants to renew the prayer of bail which was earlier rejected vide order dated 08.03.2016 passed in Cri. Misc. No. 58333 of 2015, on the ground that the petitioner is suffering in custody since 15.04.2015, the amount has not been recovered from the possession of the petitioner or from his house, other co-accused Rajesh Mahto has been allowed bail by order dated 02.05.2016 vide Cr. Misc. No. 18200 of 2016 and, as such, the petitioner deserves sympathetic consideration.
The learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer of bail by submitting that the petitioner was caught with fire arm and on
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.30420 of 2018(2) dt.16-05-2018 2/2 the basis of confessional statement amount of Rs. 80,000/- was also recovered and further the petitioner has got criminal antecedent. Call detail report of the mobile of the petitioner has also been found at the same location near the place of occurrence.
In the facts and circumstances stated above, finding no good ground, at present for reconsideration of prayer of the bail, again prayer of the bail of the petitioner stands rejected in connection with Sessions Trail No. 393 of 2015, arising out of Rupauli (Akbarpur) P.S. Case No. 285 of 2014 pending in the court of learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Purnea.
However, the learned trail Court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same preferably within six months, from date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, failing which if the petitioner at no fault, may be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail.
(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J.) Rajiv/- U T