Nishu Kumar Singh @ Chhotak Singh @ Chotani Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.82284 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-142 Year-2019 Thana- BUXAR INDUSTRIAL District- Buxar ====================================================== Nishu Kumar Singh @ Chhotak Singh @ Chotani Singh, Son of Sri Munu Singh, Resident of Village - Mazariya, Dakshin Tola, P.S.- Industrial Area (Buxar), District - Buxar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajiv Ranjan Kr. Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anita Kumari Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 29-06-2020 Heard Mr. Rajiv Ranjan Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Anita Kumari Singh, learned A.P.P. for the State through Video Conferencing. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Buxar (Industrial Area) P.S. Case No. 142 of 2019, registered under Sections 341, 323 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar.

The accusation is that while informant, Raushan Kumar Singh was in the way then he saw that Nishu Singh @ Chhotani Singh (petitioner) and Golu Kumar Singh along with four to five persons were scuffling with each other. When the informant, Raushan Kumar Singh reached there then Nishu

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82284 of 2019(3) dt.29-06-2020 2/2 Kumar @ Chhotanki Singh (petitioner) fired through his gun causing injury at his hand and stomach. Thereafter, informant was rushed at V.K. Global Hospital, Buxar for his treatment. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that while it is alleged in the FIR that in the firing of the petitioner, informant sustained two injuries but only one injury was found on the person of the informant in his medical examination. Further submission is that petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of allegation against the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, his prayer for grant of anticipatory bail stands rejected. The petitioner is directed to surrender before the trial court within four weeks and pray for regular bail, which would be considered by the trial court in accordance with law without being prejudiced by the order of this Court.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Bhardwaj/- U T