Md. Kallu @ Kallu Miyan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87767 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-15 Year-2025 Thana- HATHIDAH District- Patna ====================================================== Md. Kallu @ Kallu Miyan Son of Late Md. Suleman Miyan @ Md. Suleman Resident of Village- Dariyapur Tola P.S- Hathidah, Dist- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Kumar Manglam For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Madhura Nand Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 11-02-2026 Heard the parties.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Hathidah P.S. Case No. 15 of 2025 registered for the offences under Sections 103(1), 3(5) of the B.N.S.
3. The petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and is in custody since 16.02.2025
4. As per FIR, informant raised suspicion regarding petitioner as to commit the murder of his father alongwith other unknown accused persons after a dispute which alleged to surfaced in the toddy shop of one Kaushalya Devi.
5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87767 of 2025(2) dt.11-02-2026 2/3 petitioner submitted that as it was informed to informant by one Kaushalya Devi that on the day of missing of father of informant one altercation took place at her toddy shop with his father and petitioner and unknown, the petitioner was implicated with present case. It is submitted that during investigation nothing incriminating material transpired out of suspicion as raised through FIR to connect petitioner prima-facie with present crime in question. While concluding the argument, it is submitted that petitioner found involved in two more criminal cases where he is on bail and moreover, investigation of this case is completed, for which charge-sheet has been submitted, as such, there is no chance of tampering with the evidence.
6. Learned APP opposes the prayer of bail.
7. In view of aforesaid factual submission and by taking note of fact as save and except suspicion arising out of statement of one Kaushalya Devi, prima-facie nothing incriminating appears recovered/surfaced as to
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87767 of 2025(2) dt.11-02-2026 3/3 connect the petitioner with the present crime in question, coupled with fact as investigation of this case already completed where petitioner remains in custody since 16.02.2025, accordingly petitioner above named, is directed to be released on bail in connection with Hathidah P.S. Case No. 15 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Spl. Judge, SC/ST Act, Patna /concerned court, subject to the conditions as mentioned under Section 480(3) of BNSS.
(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J) Sudha/- U T