← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./4313/2025bail granted

Mustafa Alam @ Md Mustafa Alam v. The State Of Bihar

2025-02-12Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4313 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-199 Year-2024 Thana- KARPI District- Jehanabad ====================================================== 1.

Mustafa Alam @ Md Mustafa Alam Son of Ahmad Miyan @ Sheikh Ahmad Resident of village- Rohai P.S -Karpi, Dist- Arwal 2.

Md. Danish son of Md. Nisar Resident of village- Rohai P.S -Karpi, DistArwal 3.

Ahmad Mihan son of Juter Miyan @ Jutair Miyan, Resident of villageRohai P.S -Karpi, Dist- Arwal ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Dhananjay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Harendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 12-02-2025 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126 (2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 109, 74, 303(2), 353 and 3(5) of B.N.S. 3.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on account of disputes relating to land, it is alleged that Mustafa Alam assaulted the informant, Md. Sakib and Md. Sarfaraz by means of hammer and Munna assaulted Afsar by means of Khanti.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4313 of 2025(2) dt.12-02-2025 2/2 4.

It is next submitted that the injury suffered by the injured is simple in nature and on account of disputes relating to land, the alleged occurrence had taken place in which both sides assaulted each other, but then it is fairly submitted that injury of Afsar was opined to be grievous by the doctor but then Munna is not a petitioner in the instant anticipatory bail application. 5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

6.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Karpi P.S. Case No. 199 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) SUMIT/- U T