← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./5426/2024allowed

Md. Aqueed v. The State Of Bihar

2024-03-21Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5426 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-163 Year-2023 Thana- ANDHRAMATH District- Madhubani ====================================================== MD. AQUEED SON OF MOHAMMAD SALADUDDIN KHAN R/O VILLAGE AND P.O.- LAUKAHI, P.S.- LAUKAHI, DIST.- MADHUBANI ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.

THE VIGILANCE INVESTIGATION BUREAU THROUGH THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL. BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vijay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Umanath Mishra, APP For the Vigilance : Mr. Arvind Kumar, Special P.P. Vigilance Mr. Paritosh Parimal, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 21-03-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the Vigilance.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 & 120B of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The petitioner is said to have appointed on the post of Niyojit Teacher on the basis of fake T.E.T. marks-sheet.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that no such occurrence as alleged ever took place. He has been falsely implicated in this case. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. It is brought on record by way of supplementary

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5426 of 2024(3) dt.21-03-2024 2/2 affidavit that the services of the petitioner has already been terminated vide letter no.10 dated 16.02.2024 but the copy of the same was not supplied to the petitioner. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

5. Learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the Vigilance opposed the prayer for bail.

6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case as well as the fact that the petitioner has already been terminated from the service, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Andhramath P.S. Case No. 163 of 2023, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Trivedi/- U T