Pritosh Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88528 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-480 Year-2024 Thana- TARAIYA District- Saran ====================================================== Pritosh Singh Son of Surendra Singh Resident of Village- Bhatgai, P.S.- Taraiya, District- Saran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Yugal Kishore, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ramchandra Sahni, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 06-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Session Trial No. 674/2025, arising out of Taraiya P.S. Case No. 480 of 2024, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 80(2), 238(2)/3(5) of the B.N.S.

3. As per prosecution case, the petitioner is the husband of the deceased. The dead body of the deceased was recovered from bank of the river. The petitioner is in jail since 23.01.2025.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He further submits that the deceased has died natural death and no poison has detected in the viscera report. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88528 of 2025(6) dt.06-05-2026 2/2

5. Learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer for bail. Learned counsel for the informant further submits that the deceased was killed by the petitioner and accused persons and the dead body was recovered from bank of the river. He further submits that if the petitioner is innocent he would have inform the Police about the disappearance of the deceased but nothing has done by the petitioner and other accused persons. The trial is also going on.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, this application is dismissed.

7. It is made clear that any observation made herein is prima facie in nature and limited solely for the purpose of adjudication of the present bail application. Such observations shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case and shall not influence the trial or any other proceedings in any manner.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Ranjeet/- U T