Dilip Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87167 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-248 Year-2025 Thana- NAGARNAUSA District- Nalanda ====================================================== Dilip Kumar S/O Late Harinandan Yadav R/O Village- Moniyampur, P.SNagarnausa, District- Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rakesh Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Binod Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 05-01-2026 Heard Mr. Rakesh Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Binod Kumar, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Nagarnausa P.S. Case No. 248 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 190(1), 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 352, 351(3) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. The case of the prosecution in short is that the petitioner along with others surrounded the informant and his brother. The petitioner ordered his brother, namely Chandan, to kill the informant, and on this, Chandan Kumar fired at the informant, and the gunshot hit him in the left arm. After that, it is alleged that both brothers managed to escape and indiscriminate firing was made.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87167 of 2025(2) dt.05-01-2026 2/2

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that from perusal of the FIR it is clear that there is no allegation of assault against the petitioner. The petitioner is only the order giver. He further submits that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 25.09.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hilsa, Nalanda in connection with Nagarnausa P.S. Case No. 248 of 2025. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T