Ajeet Kumar @ Ajeet Kumar Ram v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1385 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-129 Year-2024 Thana- YADOPUR District- Gopalganj ====================================================== 1.
Ajeet Kumar @ Ajeet Kumar Ram S/o Hemu Ram Resident of VillageBhuwali Tola, P.S.- Yadopur, District- Gopalganj 2.
Rohit Kumar S/o Hemu Ram Resident of Village- Bhuwali Tola, P.S.- Yadopur, District- Gopalganj 3.
Sita Kumari D/o Hemu Ram Resident of Village- Bhuwali Tola, P.S.- Yadopur, District- Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Shubhangi Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Anil Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 05-02-2025 Heard the parties.
2. The petitioners are named in the F.I.R. and apprehending their arrest in connection with Yadavpur P.S. Case No. 129 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 379, 354(B), 307, 506/34 of the IPC.
3. The allegation against petitioners is to assault the complainant/informant by knife and other weapons, having intention to cause death of the complainant/informant and also to outrage her modesty.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1385 of 2025(2) dt.05-02-2025 2/3
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that the present FIR was lodged on the basis of complaint case bearing no. 1169(c) of 2024 dated 14.06.2024. It is submitted that the present complaint was an afterthought to counter the FIR lodged by petitioner of the present case which was registered long back i.e., on 30.05.2024 as Yadavpur P.S. Case no. 84 of 2024 against informant and others. It is further pointed out that both parties are in inimical terms and the nature of injury as claimed to be received by informant/complainant during the occurrence upon medical examination was found simple in nature, negating prima-facie intention to cause death. While concluding arguments, it is submitted that above named petitioners are of clean antecedent.
5. Learned APP, opposes the prayer of bail.
6. In view of aforesaid facts and submission and for the reasons that the present FIR was lodged with delay of more than one month, where injury found simple
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1385 of 2025(2) dt.05-02-2025 3/3 in nature, which also not appears repeated, negating prima-facie intention of petitioners to cause death, accordingly all three above-named petitioners, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks, are directed to be released on bail, furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Addl. C.J.M. 1st, Gopalganj/concerned Court, where the case is pending in connection with Yadavpur P.S. Case No. 129 of 2024 , subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C/Section 482(2) of BNSS.
(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J) Sudha/- U T