Raj Kumar @ Raju Bind @ Raju Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87159 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-376 Year-2025 Thana- SULTANGANJ District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Raj Kumar @ Raju Bind @ Raju Kumar Son of Dilo Bind @ Dilo Vinod R/o Villlage - Pildauri, Bind Tola, P.S. - Sultanganj, Dist. - Bhagalpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bijendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Mohammad Sufyan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 05-01-2026 Heard Mr. Bijendra Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Mohammad Sufyan, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Sultanganj P.S. Case No. 376 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(2), 109, 351(2), 352, 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. The case of the prosecution in short is that the petitioner has assaulted the informant and the co-accused, namely, Chhotu, has fired at the informant.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that there is a lame allegation against the petitioner that he has assaulted the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87159 of 2025(2) dt.05-01-2026 2/2 informant with slaps and fists. The allegations are bailable in nature. It has also been submitted that the main thrust of allegation is against the co-accused, namely, Chhotu. He further submits that a statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 24.08.2025.

5. The learned APP for the State has conceded to the argument of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the main thrust of allegation is against one co-accused namely, Chhotu.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned District & Additional Sessions Judge-I, Bhagalpur in connection with Sultanganj P.S. Case No. 376 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T