Bindeshwari Yadav And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.50992 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -259 Year- 2017 Thana -RANIGANJ District- ARRARIA ======================================================
1. Bindeshwari Yadav, Son of Late Kalaru Yadav,
2. Sanjay Yadav, Son of Bindeshwari Yadav.
3. Bablu Yadav, Son of Bindeshwari Yadav.
4. Mukesh Yadav, Son of Bindeshwari Yadav. All are resident of VillageParmanpur, P.S.- Raniganj, Dist.- Araria. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. R.K.Singh For the Opposite Party/s Mr.T.P.Mandal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 04-09-2018 Heard the parties.
The petitioners seek pre-arrest bail in Raniganj P.S.Case No.259 of 2017 registered for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 325, 307 and 504 of Indian Penal Code.
Allegation against the petitioner no.1 is of assault on the head of the informant and petitioner no.3 of catching hold of the informant. Petitioners no.1 and 4 are also named in the F.I.R. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that there is land dispute between the parties and no specific allegation has been attributed to the petitioners no.1 and 4 and petitioner no.3 caught hold of the informant and though the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50992 of 2018 (2) dt.04-09-2018 2/3 injuries are simple in nature but the doctor opined that the injuries are grievous in nature Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Araria, in Raniganj P.S.Case No.259 of 2017 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr.P.C. and (1) one of the bailors must be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court. (ii) the petitioners will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence and the petitioners shall co-operate in the investigation of the case and make themselves available as and when required by the police, otherwise, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of their bail bonds.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) AnilKrSinha/- U
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50992 of 2018 (2) dt.04-09-2018 3/3