Suresh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.82019 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-375 Year-2015 Thana- GOPALGANJ COMPLAINT CASE District- Gopalganj ====================================================== 1.
SURESH YADAV Son of Sita Ram Yadav 2.
Raj Kumar Yadav @ Raju Kumar Yadav Son of Madho Prasad Yadav Both are Resident of Village- Shivsthan, Thawe, P.S.- Thawe, DistrictGopalganj. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.
Vikram Prasad Yadav Son of Ram Brickh Prasad Yadav Resident of VillageLuhsi, P.S.- Uchkagaon, District- Gopalganj. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Dhramveer, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Uday Pratap Singh, APP For O.P.No.2 : Mr.Shyameshwar Kr.Singh, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 24-01-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 138 of the N.I.Act and Section 406/420 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioners are ready to refund Rs.Seven lacs to opposite party No.2. The aforesaid amount was paid by the petitioners through cheque to opposite party No.2 which allegedly bounced. Petitioners are ready to pay the aforesaid amount within four months.
Hence, let the petitioners, above named, in the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82019 of 2019(2) dt.24-01-2020 2/2 event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000 (Twenty Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Complaint Case No. 375 of 2015, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and further the petitioners shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioners.
If the petitioners would fail to comply his undertaking, it would be a ground for cancellation of this bail by the learned court below itself. If the payment is already made within aforesaid period, the learned court below shall confirm the provisional anticipatory bail of the petitioners. (Birendra Kumar, J) Nitesh/- U T