Harendra Kumar @ Halendra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87202 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-147 Year-2025 Thana- SONHAN District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== Harendra Kumar @ Halendra Kumar Son of Chhathu Ram Resident of village- Sion, Ps- Bhabua, Dist- Kaimur at Bhabua ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pawan Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Narendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 30-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Sonhan P.S. Case No. 147 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 309(6) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act and added Section 103(1) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the informant was moving on a Luna motorcycle in the market, when three persons on another motorcycle intercepted him, snatched his bag, and opened fire. During the course of treatment, the informant's brother, namely, Yudhisthir Seth, succumbed to his injuries. The FIR was lodged against unknown miscreants.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87202 of 2025(3) dt.30-01-2026 2/2 offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. During the course of investigation, co-accused namely, Ritik Roushan @ Bobby in his confessional statement has stated that he himself fired at the back of Yudhisthir Seth. It is also contended that the informant did not identify the petitioner. He further submits that nothing has been recovered from his conscious possession. Save and except the confessional statement of co-accused, there is nothing against the petitioner. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 07.08.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabua in connection with Sonhan P.S. Case No. 147 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T