← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./5453/2025bail rejected

Vijay Kamat @ Vijay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-02-04Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5453 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-108 Year-2023 Thana- MAHISHI District- Saharsa ====================================================== Vijay Kamat @ Vijay Kumar Son of Vindeshwari Vishwas Resident of Village - Behat, P.S. - Sonvarsha, District - Saharsa ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1 .

The State of Bihar 2.

Raman Kamat Son of Yogi Kamat Resident of Village - Malpura, Ward No.10, P.S. - Mahishi, District - Saharsa ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rabindra Prasad Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Harendra Prasad , APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 04-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State .

2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 366(A), 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 8, 12 of the POCSO Act. 3 . As per the prosecution case , on 17.04.2023 at about 4:00 PM, while daughter of informant went outside to attend call of nature, co-accused Vijay Kamat @ Kallu with the help of petitioners kidnapped her for the purpose of marriage .

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is daily wage labour and he is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case . As a matter of fact, on the alleged

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5453 of 2025(2) dt.04-02-2025 2/2 date and time of occurrence , petitioner was not present in the village . Petitioner is married persons and living with wife and children .

5 . Learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that petitioner is named in the F.I.R., and there is specific allegation against the petitioner that he kidnapped the victim for the purpose of marriage .

6. Considering the nature of accusation and gravity of offence , prayer for pre-arrest bail of the petitioner is rejected. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Koushik/- U T