Sheo Kumar @ Shiv Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87406 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1089 Year-2025 Thana- JAHANABAD District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Sheo Kumar @ Shiv Kumar Son of Doman Yadav R/o Village - Irki, P.S. - Jahanabad, P.S. - Jehanabad.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Praveen Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Nirmala Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 12-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 352, 351(2), and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3. As per the F.I.R., the petitioner and 3-4 unknown persons abused and assaulted the informant and his brother. Allegation against the petitioner is that he inflicted knife blow upon the informant due to which his nose was cut.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. Further submission is that petitioner and informant are cousin brothers. As a matter of fact, some money of the petitioner was due upon the informant and when petitioner demanded his due money, some altercation took place between them near the gate of government school and in altercation, informant fell down on

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87406 of 2025(2) dt.12-01-2026 2/2 the sharp edge iron gate of the school due to which, he sustained injury on his nose. Although, it is stated that the injury caused to informant is grievous in nature but the same is not dangerous to life. The injury report shows that the said injury caused by hard blunt object and a sharp blunt object and it is not by the knife as alleged. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and he undertakes to cooperate in the investigation and trial.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposed the prayer for bail.

6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, let the above named petitioner be released on bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad in connection with Jehanabad P.S. Case No. 1089 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) utkarsh/- U T