← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./530/2020bail granted

Navin Kumar Rai v. The State Of Bihar

2020-01-16Mr. Justice Birendra Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.530 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-57 Year-2019 Thana- SHRI NAGAR District- Madhepura ====================================================== NAVIN KUMAR RAI Son of Manoj Kumar Rai Resident of Village - Mangalwara Tola Rangpattim Ward No. 4, P.S.- Srinagar, Distt - Madhepura. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Dinesh Prasad Verma, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Satyavrat Verma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 16-01-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 25(1-b)a,26 of the Arms Act.

A country made loaded pistol was allegedly recovered from possession of the petitioner. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. Investigation of the case is already complete. In the aforesaid circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail after framing of the charge so that the trial may not hamper on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Srinagar P.S.Case No.57

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.530 of 2020(2) dt.16-01-2020 2/2 of 2019, subject to the condition that both bailors shall be resident of territorial jurisdiction of the learned court below as well as petitioner shall not leave the country without permission of the Court and further the petitioner shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner. The learned Trial Court is directed to expedite the framing of the charge thereafter to release the petitioner. (Birendra Kumar, J) Nitesh/- U T