Devendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.81590 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-181 Year-2019 Thana- ATRI District- Gaya ====================================================== DEVENDRA YADAV Son of Ramadhin Yadav @ Ramadhin Prasad Resident of Village - Pali, Police Station- Atri and District - Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr.Manish Kumar No2, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Singh, Addl Public Prosecutor ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 11-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 307/379 and other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is a case and counter case and both sides sustained injuries. Petitioner is alleged to have inflicted injury to the informant by iron rod. There is land dispute.

Considering the facts of the case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the Court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate 13, Gaya in Atri Police Station Case No. 181 of 2019, on the following conditions:-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.81590 of 2019(2) dt.11-12-2019 2/2 properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Shashi U T