Shaurab Kumar Guput @ Shaurab Guput @ Shaurab Kumar @ Saurab Kumar Guput v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 81548 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-61 Year-2019 Thana- VISHNUPAD District- Gaya ====================================================== Shaurab Kumar Guput @ Shaurab Guput @ Shaurab Kumar @ Saurab Kumar Guput, Male, aged about 25 years, Son of Sadanand Guput, Resident of Village - Deochaura, Police Station- Vishnupad and District- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Manish Kumar No.2, Advocate For the State :

Mr.Dilip Kumar No.1, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 13-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the informant and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Vlishnupad P.S. Case No. 61 of 2019 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 325, 307, 504, 379 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per F.I.R., in brief, is that co-accused Mahesh Lal Gayab assaulted the informant by Pasuli on his head and Lal Guput assaulted the informant by iron rod on his head and there is general allegation of assault against all to assault by lathi and rod to informant and there is allegation that petitioner assaulted the iformant on his head by pistol butt.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is case and counter case between the parties. It is further submitted

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 81548 of 2019(2) dt.13-02-2020 2/2 that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in a dispute between the two groups of Panda in course of performing Pinddan in the campus of Vishunpad Temple at Gaya. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the co-accused and has been granted anticipatory bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court and others have been granted bail by the court below itself.

Learned counsel for the informant submits that some of the accused persons have been granted regular bail, therefore, it is not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner be released on bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Vishnupad P.S. Case No. 61 of 2019, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Nasimul/- U T