← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./86426/2019dismissed

Anil Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2023-05-09Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86426 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1354 Year-2012 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPatna ====================================================== 1.

ANIL KUMAR SINGH Son of Late Ayodhya Singh Resident of SHE 17/2005, B58-61-62, Ashok Vihar Colony, Phase-1, Pahariya, P.S.- Pahariya, District - Varanasi, State Uttar Pradesh.

2.

Madhuri Singh Wife of Anil Kumar Singh Resident of SHE 17/2005, B5861-62, Ashok Vihar Colony, Phase-1, Pahariya, P.S.- Pahariya, District - Varanasi, State Uttar Pradesh.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.

Sabita Kumari Wife of Amit Singh Daughter of Surendra Prasad Singh Gautam, Resident of Mohalla - Tapeshwar Nagar, Jagdeo Path, P.S.- Rupaspur, District - Patna.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shakti Suman Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Raj Kishore Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 09-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

This application is filed for quashing of the order dated 29.08.2018 passed by learned 2nd Additional District and Session Judge, Patna in Criminal Revision No. 276 of 2018, arising out of Complaint Case No. 1354 (C) of 2012 has upheld the order dated 26.04.2018 passed by the learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Danapur wherein the learned Magistrate has rejected the petition for discharge filed by the petitioners. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 that in this case all the material is on the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86426 of 2019(7) dt.09-05-2023 2/2 verge of the completion as five witnesses have been examined by the court below.

In view of the above statement of learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2, there is no need to proceed further in the matter.

Accordingly, this application is dismissed.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Ranjeet/- U T