Praveen Kumar @ Vikky @ Praveen Yadav @ Vikky Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4503 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-57 Year-2018 Thana- MOKAMAH District- Patna ====================================================== Praveen Kumar @ Vikky @ Praveen Yadav @ Vikky Yadav Son of Bhola Yadav Resident of Mor English, P.S. Mokama, District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Santosh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ram Sumiran Rai ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 02-02-2024
1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.
2. This is the fifth attempt of the petitioner to seek bail. The learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that charges were framed on 29.03.2023 and thereafter in between 12.10.2023 to 08.01.2024, five witnesses have been examined but still four more witnesses remains to be examined.
3. Since the trial is progressing, as such, the Court for the present is not inclined to entertain the regular bail application of the petitioner.
3. The bail application of the petitioner stands rejected.
4. The learned trial court shall make endeavours to ensure that without giving unnecessary adjournments the trial is concluded within a period of nine months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. In the event if the trial is not concluded
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4503 of 2024(2) dt.02-02-2024 2/2 within a period of nine months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in that event the petitioner will be entitled to file regular bail before the learned trial court itself and in the event if it is found that for no fault of the petitioner the trial could not be concluded in that event the learned trial court shall pass order in accordance with law without being influenced by the fact that the regular bail application of the petitioner has been rejected earlier by this Court as petitioner is in custody since 16.04.2019. (Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T