Rahul Bindeshwari Sah @ Rahul Sah @ Rahul Vindeshwari Saah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.90312 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-24 Year-2024 Thana- BASANTPUR District- Siwan ====================================================== Rahul Bindeshwari Sah @ Rahul Sah @ Rahul Vindeshwari Saah S/oVindeshwari Gupta Resident of Village -Kathua , PS-Daraudha , Dist- Siwan ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Pooja Kumari W/o- Rahul Bindeshwari Sah @ Rahul Sah @ Rahul Vindeshwari Saah, D/o- Dhrup Prasad R/o Village- Lakhnaura , PS-Lakri Naviganj, Dist - Siwan ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Dr. Ajeet Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 09-01-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner in this application prays for bail apprehending his arrest in connection with Basantpur (LNG) P.S. Case no.24 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, the informant states that she was married to the petitioner herein. The accused persons kept her well for sometime but soon thereafter the accused started making demand of a four wheeler vehicle. She was physically and mentally tortured and was forced out of the house.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case only for the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90312 of 2024(2) dt.09-01-2025 2/2 reason that he happens to be the husband of the informant. The allegation of demand of dowry and torture etc. are all false and concocted. The petitioner has always been ready to amicably settle the dispute between the parties and to reside together, however inspite of counselling held in the learned Court below, the same failed. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent. He undertakes to cooperate in the case.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the nature of allegation against the petitioner in the FIR and the petitioner not having any criminal antecedent, it is directed that the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks, be released on anticipatory bail in connection with Basantpur (LNG) P.S. Case no.24 of 2024 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Siwan.

(Partha Sarthy, J) Saurabh/- U T