Guddu Yadav And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.62771 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -44 Year- 2017 Thana -SHANKARPUR District- MADHEPURA ======================================================

1. Guddu Yadav son of Bal Govind @ Bal Govind Yadav.

2. Bulbul Yadav, son of Mehi Yadav. Both resident of Village- Machhaha, Police Station- Shankarpur, District- Madhepura. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Uday Chand Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Dashrath Mehta ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 05-11-2018 Heard the parties.

The petitioners seek regular bail in connection with Shankarpur P.S.Case No.44 of 2017 registered for offences punishable under Sections 302, 201, 120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioners as per FIR is of causing death of the daughter of the informant and getting the body traceless. Petitioners are not named in the FIR. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that later on in the re-statement name of the petitioner transpired along with the other accused persons, nothing specific has been attributed against them and the other co-accused persons have been granted bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, vide order

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.62771 of 2018 (2) dt.05-11-2018 2/2 dated 8.10.2018 passed in Cr. Misc. No.62179 of 2018. He is in custody since 22.6.2017.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioners, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of ACJM-I, Madhepura in connection with Shankarpur P.S.Case No.44 of 2017.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioners will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioners shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make themselves available as and when required by the court and in the event of failure to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of their bail bond.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T