Patna High CourtCR. MISC./62529/2018bail granted

Rayva Manjhi @ Reva Manjhi And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

2018-10-10Mr. Justice Sanjay Priya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.62529 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -60 Year- 2018 Thana -JAMUI District- JAMUI ======================================================

1. Rayva Manjhi @ Reva Manjhi, son of Ako Manjhi @ Chako Manjhi.

2. Rajendra Manjhi, son of Rayva Manjhi @ Reva Manjhi, both are resident of village- Ujhandi, P.S. & Distirct-Jamui. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== With Criminal Miscellaneous No.62642 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -60 Year- 2018 Thana -JAMUI District- JAMUI ====================================================== AJAY MANJHI @ RANJAY MANJHI, S/o Shibu Manjhi@ Damad of Mahabir Manjhi, resident of village- Aghra, P.S.+District- Jamui. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

(In both cases) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Yogendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 2/ 10-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

Petitioners seek bail in Jamui P.S. Case No.60 of 2018 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 147, 148,149, 341, 323, 302 Indian Penal Code.

Counsel for the petitioners submits that mere

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.62529 of 2018 (2) dt.10-10-2018 2/2 suspicion has been raised against the petitioners. There is no eye witness to the occurrence. In the written report, it is alleged that altercation had taken place between the deceased and Mahabir Manjhi. Deceased had gone to sleep in the Basa where all the accused persons assaulted him by means to lathi, danda due to which he died.

Petitioners are in custody since 08.04.2018, 21.07.2018 and 09.02.2018 respectively.

Counsel for the petitioners submits that it is mentioned in para 3 of the bail petition that no blood stain was found at the place of occurrence.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioners for grant of bail is allowed. Let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui, in connection with Jamui P.S. Case No.60 of 2018, subject to the condition that both the bailors shall be close relative of the petitioners.

(Sanjay Priya, J) JA/- U T