← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/1316/2025disposed

M/S White House Residency v. The Chairman, Bihar State Pollution Control Board

2025-03-04Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1316 of 2025 ====================================================== M/s White House Residency through its proprietor Bharat Yadav, age 52 years (M), S/o Prameshwar Yadav, R/o Rani Kothi, Williams Town, P.S.-Williams Town B, District-Deoghar-814112, Jharkhand.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Chairman, Bihar State Pollution Control Board Patna. 2.

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Department of Environment and Forest, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The District Magistrate, District-Munger, Bihar. 4.

The Circle Officer, Circle Office, P.O. and P.S.-Jamalpur, District-Munger, Bihar.

5.

The Executive Officer, Jamalpur Municipality, District-Munger, Bihar. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anuj Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Sunil Kumar Mandal, SC-3 :

Mr. Arjun Prasad, AC to SC-3 For the BSPCB :

Mr. Kumar Ravish, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 04-03-2025 Heard Mr. Anuj Kumar, learned senior counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Sunil Kumar Mandal, learned counsel for the State and Mr. Kumar Ravish, learned counsel for the Bihar State Pollution Control Board.

2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ application with liberty to file a fresh application in accordance with law before respondent no.1.

3.In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to respondent no.1 to take necessary

Patna High Court CWJC No.1316 of 2025(2) dt.04-03-2025 2/2 steps for issuing of Content to Operate and Content to Establish from the concerned authority and the previous direction of closure dated 25.11.2025 (Annexure-P/4) should not influence the present decision-making process.

4. With the aforesaid liberty/direction, the writ petition stands disposed of.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Suruchi/- U