Badal Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88904 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-231 Year-2025 Thana- Kadirganj P.S. District- Nawada ====================================================== Badal chaudhary Son of Gore Lal Chaudhary Resident of VillageKhajurbigha, P.S.- Kadirganj, District- Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Bipin Kumar, Advocate Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ganesh Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 22-01-2026 Heard Mr. Bipin Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ganesh Prasad Singh, learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Sessions Trial No. 603 of 2025 arising out of Kadirganj P.S. Case No. 231 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 303(2) and 352 of the B.N.S., 2023.
3. The case of the prosecution in short is that the petitioner has taken away Rs. 1,62,000/- from the pocket of the informant. In the first part of the FIR, it is alleged that other accused persons have assaulted with an iron rod and bricks.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88904 of 2025(2) dt.22-01-2026 2/3 petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though there is an allegation that the petitioner has taken Rs. 1,62,000/- from the pocket of the informant, the story that has been created by the prosecution is palpably false, as it is not possible to keep such a huge amount in a pocket. It may be kept in a bag. No other allegation is against the petitioner. It has also been submitted that no recovery has been made from the possession of this petitioner. He further submits that a statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 04.08.2025.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-XI, Nawada in connection with
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88904 of 2025(2) dt.22-01-2026 3/3 Sessions Trial No. 603 of 2025 arising out of Kadirganj P.S. Case No. 231 of 2025.
(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T