Lal Babu Yadav @ Babulal Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.5428 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-28 Year-2019 Thana- BARHAT District- Jamui ====================================================== LAL BABU YADAV @ BABULAL YADAV S/o Adhik Yadav R/o villageBhandra Tola, Sugba Mahua, P.S.- Barhat, District- Jamui ... ... Appellant/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr.Niranjan Parihar, Adv For the Respondent/s :

Mrs. Usha Kumari 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 10-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

This is an appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 against the refusal of prayer for bail by order dated 22.11.2019 in Barhat P.S.Case No.28 of 2019 passed by the learned 1st Additional District and Sessions Judge, Jamui, registered under Sections 147,148,149,341,323,504,307 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(i)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. For old dispute, co-accused-Lakhan Yadav allegedly caused injury with iron rod at the head of the informant. Thereafter, others including the appellant assaulted with lathi. Considering the nature of allegation against the appellant which is general and omnibus and of not causing any

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.5428 of 2019 dt.10-12-2019 2/2 injury at the vital part of the body, let the appellant, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court-below where the case is pending in connection with the aforesaid case, with condition that both bailors shall be resident of territorial jurisdiction of the learned court below and further the appellant shall fully cooperate with the investigation of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the appellant. Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and this appeal stands allowed.

(Birendra Kumar, J) Nitesh/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 13.12.2019 Transmission Date 13.12.2019