Raj Kishor Kumar @ Raj Kishore Sharma v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.82658 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-344 Year-2019 Thana- BAKHARI District- Begusarai ====================================================== Raj Kishor Kumar @ Raj Kishore Sharma S/o Jaynarayan Sharma Resident of Ward No. 5, Sonma, Sonwan, P.S.- Bakhri, District- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Pritish Kumar Lal, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Pradeep Narain Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 12-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in Bakhri P.S. Case No. 344 of 2019, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.
One country made pistol and two cartridges have been recovered from possession of this petitioner. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from possession of this petitioner. Independent witness have also not supported the prosecutor story. Petitioner is in custody since 29.10.2019 having clean antecedent.
Considering the facts aforesaid, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82658 of 2019(2) dt.12-12-2019 2/2 of Rs. 10,000 (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in connection with Bakhri P.S. Case No. 344 of 2019, subject to the following conditions:- (i) The petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the court below.
(ii) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) vinita/- U T