← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/3752/2018dismissed

Harendra Prasad Sinha @ Harindra Prasad Sinha v. The Union Of India And ORS

2018-03-05Justice Smt. Nilu Agrawal,Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3752 of 2018 =========================================================== Harendra Prasad Sinha @ Harindra Prasad Sinha son of late Banshi Lal Sah, R/o Mohalla Durga Colony, Khagri Road, Danapur, P.O.-Digha, P.S. Danapur, DistrictPatna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Union of India through the Chairman Railway Board Rail Bhawan, New Delhi.

2. The Chairman Railway Board, Rail Bhawan, New Delhi.

3. The General Manager (P) N.F. Railway, Maligaon, Guwahati.

4. The Divisional Railway Manager, N.F. Railway, Katihar.

5. The Divisional Railway Manager (P) N.F. Railway, Katihar.

6. The A.P.O./Gaz. N.F. Railway, Guwahati.

7. The A.P.O./II N.F. Railway, Katihar.

8. The Sr. Divisional Operating Manager, N.F. Railway, Katihar.

9. Shri Amar Kumar Das, Posted as station Manager, old Malda, at present posted at katihar, through the D.R.M. N.F. Railway, Katihar. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Naresh Chandra Verma, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, Adv. Mr. Abhimanyu Deo, Adv.

Mr. Akash Keshav,Adv.

Mr. Yash Mathur, Adv.

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI) Date: 05-03-2018 The only reason why this Court is not inclined to interfere with the order dated 28.09.2010 is that this order was passed against the present petitioner rejecting his O.A. No. 804 of 2004. Since the

Patna High Court CWJC No.3752 of 2018 dt.05-03-2018 2/2 petitioner chose to remain mum for almost eight years, the settled position almost 14 years ago when the examination was held and conducted and almost eight years since passing of the order dismissing the O.A. many a things have settled down, now the same cannot be agitated to revive a dead issue at the convenience of the petitioner.

Writ is dismissed.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) (Nilu Agrawal, J) Devendra/Arjun AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date07.03.2018 Transmission Date NA