Patna High CourtCR. MISC./87412/2025rejected

Abhay Kumar Jha @ Abhay Jha @ Sonu Jha v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-23Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87412 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-138 Year-2025 Thana- TISIAUTA District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1.

Abhay Kumar Jha @ Abhay Jha @ Sonu Jha S/O Late Mahesh Jha R/O Vill. - Bishanupur Jasparha, P.S- Tisiauta, Dist.- Vaishali. 2.

Nirbhay Kumar @ Nirbhay Jha @ Monu S/O Late Mahesh Jha R/O Vill. - Bishanupur Jasparha, P.S- Tisiauta, Dist.- Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anuj Kumar, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Manoj Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 23-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Tisiauta P.S. Case No. 138 of 2025, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 303(2), 109, 117(2), 352, 351(2) of the B.N.S.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that on 15.08.2025 at about 09:25 pm, Sonu Jha lured away the nephew of the informant for eating and drinking at his home. Thereafter, Reena Devi took away the mobile worth Rs. 40,000/- and Archana Jha took his gold chain from his neck. On protest, Sonu Jha and other co-accused armed with iron rod, bricks and lathi

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87412 of 2025(3) dt.23-02-2026 2/2 started assaulting informant's nephew. After this, Sonu Jha called informant over phone and said to take his nephew. When the informant reached there, he found his nephew unconscious. He was taken to PHC Jandaha for treatment.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case. The petitioners have not committed any offence and the entire story is false and concocted. He further submits that the injury sustained by the victim appears to be grievous in nature.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer of anticipatory bail.

6. Considering the serious nature of the offence alleged to have been committed by the petitioners and also taking note of the fact that the injury sustained by the victim is grievous in nature, this Court is not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

Accordingly, the present anticipatory bail application stands rejected.

(Alok Kumar Sinha, J) kiran/- U T