Nirdosh Kumar @ Nirdosh Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87582 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-70 Year-2025 Thana- GANGTA District- Munger ====================================================== Nirdosh Kumar @ Nirdosh Kumar Singh Son of Bhola Singh @ Bhola Prasad Singh R/Vill. - Mahimachak, P.S.- Gangta, Distt. - Munger. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Jyoti Ranjan Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Manoj Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 15-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 110, 76, 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S.

3. The allegation in the first information report is that the accused persons came variously armed to the house of the informant and while two of the persons misbehaved with his daughter and threatened to kidnap her, the present petitioner also misbehaved with bad intention and tried to hit her on the head.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it would be apparent from the F.I.R that there are superficial allegations made in the FIR with regard to misbehaviour with the daughter of the informant and when the sister-in-law of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87582 of 2025(2) dt.15-01-2026 2/3 informant intervened, all the accused persons including the petitioner are also said to have assaulted her with lathi and threatened to kill her daughter. It has further been submitted that the injury report indicates that the injuries caused are simple in nature caused by hard and blunt object as would be evident from the bail rejection order and the present petitioner was also given the privilege of Section 35 (3) of the B.N.S.S. and he never misused the said privilege granted to him and now that the charge-sheet has been submitted and he has reasonable apprehension and hence, the present anticipatory bail application.

5. The application for anticipatory bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State.

6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances and also considering the fact that the allegations made in the first information report are general and omnibus in nature and the FIR was also delayed by two days after due thought and deliberation, coupled with the fact that the injury was simple in nature and also that the petitioner never misused the privilege granted to him under Section 35(3) of B.N.S.S., let the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before learned Court below within period of four weeks,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87582 of 2025(2) dt.15-01-2026 3/3 be released on anticipatory bail in connection with Gangta P.S. Case no.70 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending subject to the condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure/Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S, 2023, subject to the conditions that the petitioner would cooperate in the investigation.

(Soni Shrivastava, J) devendra/- U T