Dukhi Ram @ Amala Ram @ Amla Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87626 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-328 Year-2025 Thana- MIRGANJ District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Dukhi Ram @ Amala Ram @ Amla Ram Son of Vishwanath Ram @ Bishwanath Ram R/o Vllage - Prayag Sumail, PS.- Mirganj, District - Gopalganj.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Raghav Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ramchandra Sahni, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 18-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Mirganj P.S. Case No. 328 of 2025, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that 83.6 liters liquor was recovered from an open place adjacent to the house of the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. Learned counsel

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87626 of 2025(2) dt.18-12-2025 2/2 for the petitioner also submits that the petitioner was not arrested on spot. Name of the petitioner has transpired in this case on the basis of disclosure made by local chaukidar. It is further submitted that the alleged recovery has been made from an open place and the same is easily accessible to the public at large. The petitioner is in custody since 07.10.2025 and has got one criminal antecedent in which he is on bail. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Mirganj P.S. Case No. 328 of 2025.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T