Vijay Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87830 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-426 Year-2025 Thana- SIRDALA District- Nawada ====================================================== Vijay Manjhi Son of Ramswarup Manjhi Resident of Village- Narauli Musahari Tola, P.S.- Sirdala, District- Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sheo Nandan Prasad, Advocate Mr. Rajnish Kumar, Advocate Ms. Sweta Burnwal, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Renu Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 18-12-2025 Heard Mr. Sheo Nandan Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Renu Kumari, learned APP for the State. 2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sirdalla PS Case No. 426 of 2025 instituted for the offences under Section/s 30(a) & 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3.

The prosecution case, in short, is that 410 liters country liquor was recovered from plastic sack. 4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. It is submitted

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87830 of 2025(2) dt.18-12-2025 2/2 that recovery is made from the joint house of the petitioner, where other family members also reside. The petitioner is in custody since 26.11.2025 and has got one criminal antecedent/s. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the BNSS, 2023. 5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 6.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 7.

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.15,000/- (Fifteen thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Sirdalla PS Case No. 426 of 2025, subject to the following conditions: (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner.

(II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Kishore/- U T