Bunty Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.89252 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-211 Year-2025 Thana- ASHTHAWAN District- Nalanda ====================================================== Bunty Yadav S/O Gandhari Yadav R/O Village- Asthawan, P.S.- Asthawan, District- Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Anil Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 22-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 190, 191(2), 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 303(2), 324(2), 352, 351(2) of B.N.S.
3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner has assaulted with khanti on the head of the informant's son due to which he became unconscious.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner and informant are son and father. The informant has solemnized
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89252 of 2025(2) dt.22-01-2026 2/3 second marriage and Gopal is the son of second marriage. There is dispute between the petitioner and the informant regarding share. The informant is not giving his share to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that from perusal of the injury report of Gopal, it will transpire that the nature of injury is simple caused by hard and blunt substance. He has further submitted that in the FIR, it is alleged that the injury was caused by khanti which is a sharp cutting weapon whereas the injury report does not correlate with the allegation. Petitioner is having criminal antecedent and most of the cases are filed by the informant. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 24.08.2025.
5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Asthawan P.S. Case No. 211 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89252 of 2025(2) dt.22-01-2026 3/3 1st Class, Nalanda at Biharsharif.
(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T