Ramvilas Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88075 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-253 Year-2025 Thana- HASPURA District- Aurangabad ====================================================== 1.

Ramvilas Yadav Son of Late Sunesar Yadav @ Suneshwar Yadav R/o Village - Manpura, Post - Dumra, P.S.- Haspura, Dist. - Aurangabad, Bihar, 824120.

2.

Raju Ranjan Kumar @ Ranjan Kumar Son of Late Bisram Singh Yadav @ Vishram Yadav R/o Village - Manpura, Post - Dumra, P.S.- Haspura, Dist. - Aurangabad, Bihar, 824120.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Alok Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Raj Kishor Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 12-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Haspura P.S. Case No. 253 of 2025, instituted under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 303(2), 109(1), 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S.

3. As per the prosecution case, on the date of occurrence petitioners along with F.I.R. named accused persons and 2-3 unknown persons armed with weapons surrounded the informant while he was going for walk in Khagdi field. The accused persons brutally assaulted the informant causing him injury on his head, chest, back etc.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88075 of 2025(2) dt.12-01-2026 2/2 petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. There is previous enmity between the parties due to division of land. Both parties are agnates. Injury to the injured is simple in nature. Due to previous case lodged by the petitioners, this case has been filed. Petitioner No. 1 has one criminal antecedent whereas Petitioner No. 2 has no criminal antecedent. They undertake to co-operate in the investigation and trial.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submission of learned counsel for the parties, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks from today, the petitioners be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.F.C., Daudnagar, Aurangabad in connection with Haspura P.S. Case No. 253 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.S.), 2023.

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) rakhi/- U T