Rajesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87415 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-97 Year-2025 Thana- MANIGACHI District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Rajesh Kumar S/O Ramchandra Mehta R/O Village- Vishanpur Tola, Dahupatti, Police Station- Bhaptiyahi, District- Supaul. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Bidhanesh Misra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Manoj Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA ORAL ORDER 11-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in Manigachhi P.S. Case No. 97 of 2025 dated 10-07-2025, registered under Sections 20 and 22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.
3. The allegation is of recovery of 8.350 kg of ganjalike substance, kept in four rectangular transparent packets beneath the seat of a car bearing Registration No. BR-50-AG2173.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87415 of 2025(3) dt.11-02-2026 2/3 present case. It is further submitted that the FIR has been lodged against unknown persons and the petitioner has been arrested during the course of investigation merely on the ground that he is the owner of the seized vehicle. It is further contended that at the time of seizure of the said car, the driver had fled away from the place of occurrence. As a matter of fact, the petitioner had lent the vehicle to the co-accused Nitish Kumar and the petitioner had no knowledge that any ganja-like substance was kept in the said car. It is also submitted that the seized ganja-like substance is more than the small quantity but less than the commercial quantity. Lastly, it is submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 14.09.2025 and has no criminal antecedents. It is submitted that the charge-sheet has already been submitted in the present case.
5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State has opposed the prayer.
6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge XI-cum- Special Judge, NDPS Darbhanga, in connection with
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87415 of 2025(3) dt.11-02-2026 3/3 Manigachhi P.S. Case No. 97 of 2025.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Khatim Reza, J) shyambihari/- U