Chintu Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87827 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-329 Year-2024 Thana- Kadirganj P.S. District- Nawada ====================================================== 1.
Chintu Singh S/O Late Lakhan Singh Resident of Village- Jamuawa, P.SKadirgaj,Dist- Nawada 2.
Rani Devi W/O Chintu Singh Resident of Village- Jamuawa, P.SKadirgaj,Dist- Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ram Anurag Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 22-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 137(2), 87 and 3(5) of B.N.S., 2023.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and petitioner no.2 is a woman and the informant alleges that on 13.12.2024 at 10:30 p.m., the petitioners came and took his daughter to their house but his daughter did not return thus alleges that her daughter was kidnapped.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87827 of 2025(2) dt.22-01-2026 2/3 petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that the date of occurrence is 13.12.2024 and the FIR was instituted on 21.12.2024, i.e., after a delay of more than seven days, which casts an aspersion on the case of the prosecution. It is also submitted that the victim on coming to know that a false case has been instituted came back and got her statement recorded under Section 180 B.N.S.S. wherein she has not supported the case of the prosecution rather has stated that she was scolded by her parents, as such, she left for the house of her maternal grandmother from where she called Vikash who came and they left and thereafter performed their marriage in a temple and that petitioners in no manner are involved in the occurrence.
5. Learned APP opposes the anticipatory bail application.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, let petitioners, above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87827 of 2025(2) dt.22-01-2026 3/3 the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Kadirganj P.S. Case No.329 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Sanjay/- U T