Patna High CourtCR. MISC./63948/2018rejected

Ranjan Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2018-12-13Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.63948 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-71 Year-2013 Thana- JHAJHA District- Jamui ====================================================== Ranjan Singh, S/o Khelaban Singh Resident of Village- Jamukharaiya, Police Station- Jhajha, District- Jamui.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Amrendra Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 13-12-2018 The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in connection with Jhajha P.S. Case No. 71 of 2013, dated 08.04.2013, instituted for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 324 and 307/34 of the I.P.C. and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that though the petitioner has been attributed with the allegation of assaulting the son of the informant by means of Farsa, no injury on the aforesaid person is available in the record of the case. The two incised injuries, which have been referred to in the order impugned, are

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.63948 of 2018(2) dt.13-12-2018 2/2 attributable to other accused persons for having caused injuries on the person of the informant, viz., Md. Mustaq. However, considering the fact that this case was lodged in the year 2013 in which charge-sheet has been submitted in the year 2016, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is, accordingly, rejected.

However, if the petitioner surrenders before the Court below within a reasonable time and seeks bail, the Court below shall take into account that no injury has been caused by the petitioner and that the case arose out of a simple dispute and shall pass orders in accordance with law without being prejudiced by the fact that the present petition for grant of anticipatory bail has not been entertained by this Court.

(Ashutosh Kumar, J) Praveen-II/- U T