Mukesh Kumar Singh @ Mukesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.82262 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-47 Year-2014 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Nawada ====================================================== MUKESH KUMAR SINGH @ MUKESH KUMAR S/o Laxman Singh @ Lakshman Prasad Singh R/o village- Dadpur, P.S.- Bela Ganj, Distt.- Gaya, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Sudha Chandra For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Md. Fahimuddin ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 11-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
The petitioner has filed the instant application for grant of bail in a case registered for the offence under sections 341, 323, 354 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.
It is stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that in the FIR being Mahila (Nawada) P.S. Case No.47 of 2014 registered for the offence under sections 341, 323, 354 and 504 of the IPC, the petitioner had been enlarged on anticipatory bail by order dated 05.05.2016 (Annexure-2) passed in Cr. Misc. No.16633 of 2016. It is further submitted that the petitioner continued to appear in the court below but as a result of an accident and subsequent operation of the petitioner, proper pairvi could not be done and ultimately his bail bond was cancelled on 08.07.2019. It is stated that thereafter he could not appear on four dates up to
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82262 of 2019(2) dt.11-12-2019 2/2 23.10.2019 and on cancellation of his bail bond he surrendered in the court below on 29.11.2019. It is submitted that the petitioner shall be cautious in future and is ready to abide by any condition. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances including that on earlier occasion the petitioner was on bail and at the moment he is in custody, the Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Let the petitioner, above named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Fourth Additional District & Sessions Judge, Nawada in connection with Mahila (Nawada) P.S. Case No.47 of 2014.
It is further directed that the petitioner shall remain present in-person on each and every date in the court below and absence of the petitioner on two consecutive dates for reason not to the satisfaction of the court, the court below may cancel his bail and take him into custody till conclusion of the trial.