Arvind Tiwari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.66027 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-86 Year-2018 Thana- MANJHAGARH District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Arvind Tiwari Son of Sri Pundev Tiwari Resident of Village- Dumaria, Police Station- Manjhagarh, District- Gopalganj.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mrs. Sanjana, Advocate.

For the informant : Mr. Shafiur Rahman, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 17-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, counsel for the informant and the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in Manjhagarh P.S. Case No. 86 of 2018 instituted for the offence under Section 302/34 of Indian Penal Code.

In the written report it is alleged that daughter of the informant was married with this petitioner about seven years back. The informant was thinking for Bidai of daughter from his sasural because her in-laws were torturing her and used to give threat to kill her. It is further alleged that on 11.4.2018 the informant got information from Chowkidar that his daughter was done to death. He went to sasural of his daughter where local people informed that she is dead and her dead body is

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.66027 of 2018(4) dt.17-12-2018 2/2 lying in Sadar Hospital Gopalganj. The informant reached Sadar Hospital and found stabbed injury on her neck and abdomen. Case diary has been received.

Post mortem report is available in the case diary wherein the Doctor has found four injuries on the neck of the deceased, two injuries on abdomen caused by sharp cutting weapon.

Police has submitted charge sheet for the offence under Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code against the petitioner and other co-accused persons.

Therefore, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage.

Prayer for bail of the petitioner stands rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial and make efforts to conclude the same as early as possible preferably within a period of nine months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

Petitioner is given liberty to renew his prayer for bail in the event the trial is not concluded within aforesaid period. S.Ali/- (Sanjay Priya, J) U T