← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./91669/2025bail rejected

Neelam Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-20Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.91669 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-373 Year-2017 Thana- KOILWAR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Neelam Devi W/o Arun Singh Resident of Village - Katkaria, P.S.- Koilwar, District - Bhojpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Raju Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 20-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in Koilwar P. S. Case No. 373 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 409, 420 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that the Sri Hira Lal Singh, Block Education Officer of Koilwar lodged a case against co-accused Vishwesar Kumar, Mohammad Ayyub Alam, Jyotindra Kumar and Raj Narayan Singh on the direction of District Program Officer and District Magistrate of Bhojpur for irregularities in the construction of buildings of different schools under Koilwar Block and for embezzlement of money.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case with ulterior motive.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.91669 of 2025(3) dt.20-02-2026 2/2 Specific allegation is against Head Master and In-charge Head Master of the schools in question. Petitioner was elected Secretary in the year 2011-12 and she has no role in the withdrawal of money. Petitioner is lady and claims clean antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that at the relevant time, this petitioner was elected Secretary and she also signed the cheques along with named accused persons for withdrawal of the money, sanctioned for construction of school buildings.

6. Considering the nature and seriousness of accusation, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is refused.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U T