Jogi Mukhia And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.22039 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -100 Year- 2017 Thana -DHAMDAHA District- PURNIA ======================================================
1. Jogi Mukhia,
2. Prakash Mukhia, Both sons of Late Chedi Mukhia, Resident of VillageSourkahi, P.S.- Dhamdaha, District- Purnea. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajit Ranjan Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 20-06-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor of the State.
The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Dhamdaha P.S. Case No. 100 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 323, 341, 504 and 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
The allegation against the petitioners is of assault to the informant with lathi-danda, causing injury.
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that there was no intention to the petitioners to assault the informant and they have been falsely implicated in this case as counter blast bearing case Dhamdaha P.S.Case No. 100 of 2017. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposes the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22039 of 2018 (3) dt.20-06-2018 2/2 prayer of bail on the ground that the injuries was grievous in nature.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as discussed above, let the petitioners above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of six weeks from the date of the order, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- ( Twenty five thousand)each with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Dhamdaha P.S.Case No. 100 of 2017 to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438 ( 2) Cr.P.C. with other that bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the Court concerned and petitioners shall cooperate in the investigation and shall be present before police as and when required, otherwise prosecution is at liberty to move for cancellation of their bail bonds. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sudha/- U T