Rabia Khatoon v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2662 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-93 Year-2024 Thana- Nehra District- Darbhanga ====================================================== 1.

Rabia Khatoon Wife of Late Md. Gulab Resident of Village - Gaina, P.S. - Nehra, District - Darbhanga 2.

Shahid Abid @Md. Shahid Afridi Son of Late Md. Gulab Resident of Village - Gaina, P.S. - Nehra, District - Darbhanga 3.

Ferzana Khatoon Daughter of Late Md. Gulab Resident of Village - Gaina, P.S. - Nehra, District - Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Virendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Bharat Lal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 09-05-2025 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Nehra P.S. Case No. 93 of 2024, registered under Sections 126(2), 115(1), 121(1), 132, 221, 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3. The informant is Principal at Utkarmit Madhya Vidhyalaya, said that two students Anjana Khatoon and Shoaib Mallik were not attending his class. So he asked them to call their guardian. The petitioners came in the office of informant, abused and assaulted him. Petitioner No.2 threatened to kill the informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have not committed any offence.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2662 of 2025(3) dt.09-05-2025 2/2 Petitioners further submits that it has not resulted any grievous injury to the informant. They are guardians of the students of Anjana Khatoon and Shoaib Mallik. Petitioners further submits that the they have clean antecedent.

5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the present case and particularly the fact that the injury sustained by the informant is simple in nature, this Court is inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

7. Let the petitioners, named above, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like each amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Darbhanga, in connection with Nehra P.S. Case No. 93 of 2024, subject to the condition laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

(Alok Kumar Sinha, J) sanjeev/- U T