Patna High CourtCR. MISC./90595/2025bail granted

Md. Ali v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-26Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.90595 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-11109 Year-2024 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPatna ====================================================== Md. Ali S/o Md. Khalil R/o Harun Nagar, Sector 2, P.s.- Phulwarisharif, Patna, Presently residing at Mohalla - Alwa Colony, Near Masjid International School, P.s.- Phulwarisharif, Distt.- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar 2.

Ruksar Parveen @ Ruksana W/o Md. Ali, D/o Late Md. Musha R/o Pnn (Jala Hua Makan), D/o Mohalla- Road no. 6, Near Gardanibagh Hosopital, P.s.- Gardanibagh, Distt.- Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dilip Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rajendra Nath Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 26-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 11109(c) of 2024, for the offence under Sections 115(2), 118(1), 178, 3(5), 35(1)(3) of the B.N.S. and cognizance has been taken u/s 85 read with section 3(5) of the B.N.S.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and others are accused of assaulting and torturing the victim for demand of Rs. 50,000/- and a car as a dowry.

4. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90595 of 2025(3) dt.26-02-2026 2/3 implicated in this case. He further submits that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner of demand of dowry. Petitioner has clean antecedent.

5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the application of the petitioner.

6. Considering the submission of the parties and in light of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar reported in (2014) 8 SCC 273, this application for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed.

7. Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the concerned Court below within four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M.F.C.- XIV, Civil Court, Patna,/concerned Court below in connection with Complaint Case No. 11109 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 / Section 482(2) of the BNSS and with further condition that:

(I). The petitioner is directed to pay a maintenance amount of Rs. 10,000/- from the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90595 of 2025(3) dt.26-02-2026 3/3 month of February 2026 to the complainant /informant. The maintenance for the month of February 2026 shall be paid to the complainant/informant within ten days from today, and thereafter, the maintenance amount shall be paid to the complainant /informant every month before the 10th day of each month."

8. It is made clear that the order of maintenance passed by this Court shall be subject to the outcome of the maintenance case in the Court of Principal Judge, Family Court concerned, if any.

9. Needless to state that, if the petitioner fails to abide by the terms and conditions, as stated hereinabove, the State shall be at liberty to file an appropriate application, before the learned concerned Court below for cancellation of bail granted to the petitioner.

10. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the Principal District & Sessions Judge, Patna through FAX for its compliance forthwith.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Ranjeet/- U T