Harbansh Thakur @ Haribansh Thakur @ Harivansh Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1560 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1083 Year-2019 Thana- AHIYAPUR District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== HARBANSH THAKUR @ HARIBANSH THAKUR @ HARIVANSH THAKUR S/O Late Suryadeo Thakur R/O Vill Mohdaiya, P.S. Minapur, Distt.- Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr.Anish Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

Mr.Madan Kumar, I/C APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 27-05-2020 Heard the parties and perused the case diary. This matter is taken up for consideration through Video Conferencing under the orders of Hon'ble the Chief Justice.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in a case registered for an offence punishable under section 387 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. He submits that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 14.10.2019. Charge sheet has also been filed in the case. Petitioner is poor carpenter and his identity card was used for taking the forged SIM card.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1560 of 2020(5) dt.27-05-2020 2/2 Learned Addl.P.P. did not controvert the facts. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, let both the petitioners, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in Ahiyapur Police Station Case No. 1083 of 2019/GR No. 4959 of 2019 on the following conditions:-

(1) Petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present, as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail-bonds shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Shashi U T