Praveen Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.583 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-115 Year-2024 Thana- THAWE District- Gopalganj ====================================================== 1.
Praveen Singh S/o Nagendra Singh R/o Village- Bhusaav, P.S.- Thawe, District- Gopalganj 2.
Sallu Singh @ Shalu Singh S/o Nagendra Singh R/o Village- Bhusaav, P.S.- Thawe, District- Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Arun .
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Md. Matloob Rab ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 16-06-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. The allegation in the First Information Report is that 8 to 10 boys came on motorcycle and assaulted the nephew of the informant namely, Md. Imran by way of sticks and steel pipes and upon raising of hulla, they fled away.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the First Information Report itself shows that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners, who are named along
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.583 of 2025(5) dt.16-06-2025 2/3 with one more Mithilesh Singh and also other 8 to 10 boys. The FIR rather discloses some specific act on behalf of Mithilesh Singh but so far others are concerned, there are general and omnibus allegations. It would also be apparent from a reading of the FIR that the informant is not an eye witness to the occurrence and none of his family members are also eye witness as the FIR clearly reveals that the victim was taken by the villagers to the hospital for treatment. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there is money dispute between the informant and the petitioners' uncle and he had also filed an FIR against the informant being Thawe P.S. Case No. 117 of 2024. The witnesses, who had been examined during the course of investigation also narrate a hearsay account of the occurrence and the statement of the victim himself has not been recorded. The final injury report has also been received which shows that the injuries are assumed to be simple in nature.
5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the application for anticipatory bail.
6. Considering all the above mentioned facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.583 of 2025(5) dt.16-06-2025 3/3 furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand)each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Thawe P.S. Case No. 115 of 2024, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C./482(2) of the B.N.S.S.
(Soni Shrivastava, J) devendra/- U T