Sadakat v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.82497 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-137 Year-2018 Thana- TARABARI District- Araria ====================================================== SADAKAT S/o Muslim Resident of Village- Surjapur, P.S. and Distt- Araria. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mukesh Kumar Rana For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dr. Indiwar Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 12-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Tarabari P.S. Case No. 137 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. Informant has alleged in his written complaint that while he was going on his motorcycle, three miscreants who had concealed their identity on the strength of arms snatched away Rs. 1,20,999/-from the dickey.

It has been submitted on behalf of petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case on the basis of confession of co-accused and except said confession there is no any other incriminating material against the petitioner. Nothing has been recovered from his possession. It has been further

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82497 of 2019(2) dt.12-12-2019 2/2 submitted that charge sheet has already been submitted and petitioner is in custody since 22.07.2019.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below, in connection with Tarabari P.S. Case No. 137 of 2018 subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and sufficient reason the trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T