Anil Kumar Singh @ Anil Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.459 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-63 Year-2024 Thana- PATAHI District- East Champaran ====================================================== Anil Kumar Singh @ Anil Singh, S/o Harendra Singh, Resident of villageKhutauna, P.S.- Patahi, District- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shailendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 10-01-2025 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Patahi P.S. Case No. 63 of 2024 for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1-B)a/26/35 and 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per allegation, the informant along with his brother and nephew was going to the house of the informant's uncle on the occasion of Holi. In the meantime, the accused persons came there and started assaulting the informant by means of lathi and garansa. Further, they started firing on the informant, his brother and nephew, but they were survived. It is further alleged that on getting information, police reached there and the empty cartridge and live cartridges were handed over to the police.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.459 of 2025(2) dt.10-01-2025 2/2 that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He has further submitted that no injury was found on the person of the informant and allegation against the petitioner are ornamental. He has also submitted that the petitioner has four criminal antecedent out of which two cases are related to excise Act. He further submits that similarly situated co-accused namely Vijay Singh has already been granted regular bail by this Court vide order dated 25.07.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 51240 of 2024. Petitioner is in custody since 12.09.2024, and he undertakes to cooperate in trial of the present case.

5. On the other hand, the learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail.

6. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above-named be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand rupees) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Motihari at East Champaran in connection with Patahi P.S. Case No. 63 of 2024. (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) khushbu/- U T