Nepali Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6024 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-651 Year-2023 Thana- HILSA District- Nalanda ====================================================== Nepali Manjhi Son of Late Khelaban Manjhi, Resident of Village- Shahpur, P.S.- Hilsa, Distt.- Nalanda.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anil Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Uday Pratap Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 05-03-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 447, 451, 326, 307 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is alleged to have fired, causing injury to the informant. He further submits that no doubt, the informant in the FIR alleges that petitioner fired, causing injury in his rib-cage. It is submitted that from perusal of the injury report annexed with the supplementary affidavit, it would manifest that the injury has been opined to be simple and the injury report does not even remotely suggest that the injury was caused by fire-arm. It is further submitted that petitioner is in custody since 05.09.2024 and chargesheet has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6024 of 2025(3) dt.05-03-2025 2/2 been submitted and the parties are own agnates and they are having dispute relating to property.

4. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State opposes the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner, but then fairly submits that from perusal of the injury report annexed with the supplementary affidavit, it does not even remotely suggest that the injury was caused by fire-arm.

5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court, where the case is pending / successor Court, in connection with Hilsa P.S. Case No. 651 of 2023.

6. It is made clear that if the learned trial Court comes to a conclusion that petitioner after his release is trying to delay the trial in any manner, the learned trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Shahnawaz/- U T